Pros and cons of abstinence only sex education

Posted on by 4 Comments ↓

From a religious standpoint, personal morality is often defined by sexual behavior. Sex education in schools can play an active role in curbing the incidence of abuse as through this medium children can be made aware of the difference between good and bad touch. One of the biggest complaints about abstinence education is that it's unrealistic.

Pros and cons of abstinence only sex education


But abstinence-only programs aren't having much success. The advocates of this method say that as the advice of abstaining from drugs, drinking and driving, etc. Since teens are often influenced by peers and the media, getting the facts is important—it's the amount of information taught in schools that have parents and teachers riled up for debate. All in good ethics. Teens that go through an abstinence only education do not have the knowledge or awareness to use contraceptives or safe sex methods when engaging in intercourse. This false security gives adolescents the idea that it's safe to have pre-marital sex whereas in abstinence education, the focus is that abstinence is the only way to prevent STDs and unwanted pregnancy. Without accurate facts, it becomes impossible for teens to make an informed decision. If not taught properly, sex education in school can become a matter of ridicule and students may not take any interest in it. Weighing Pros and Cons Abstinence Education: A study from the U. It encourages students to have healthy sexual habits. Child sexual abuse can be avoided. It provides a foundation of personal morality. Various studies suggest that effective sex education in schools prevents adolescents experimenting with sex. Despite the widespread notion that abstinence education withholds information from students regarding methods of safe sex, supporters think it packs a powerful curriculum. As a lot of emphasis is given to virginity in this program, there are chances that teenagers may indulge in some risky behavior like oral or anal sex because virginity is very commonly associated with vaginal sex. They are told that sexual intercourse before marriage is morally incorrect and should be avoided completely. It dispels myths related to sex and broadens their horizon. Sex education in schools can play an active role in curbing the incidence of abuse as through this medium children can be made aware of the difference between good and bad touch. But that response sidesteps an important point: This is even more harmful as incorrect information is extremely lethal as it can actually leave a wrong impression on the students. According to a National Survey of Family Growth, on average, young people have sex for the first time at about age 17, but they don't marry until their mids. These statistics make saving oneself until marriage very difficult, if not unrealistic. Pros and Cons of Abstinence Only Education Parents Should Know About It is important for you to know about the pros and cons of abstinence only education, if you are planning to enroll your child into this program. Congress should stop funding abstinence-only ed". Could a better designed program provide better results and reduce the high rates of teen pregnancy in the US?

Pros and cons of abstinence only sex education

Video about pros and cons of abstinence only sex education:

Gurl 101 – 6 Reasons Abstinence-Only Education Can Be Dangerous





Darkness education isn't without stayed flaws. Getty Restaurants Splash more articles on Absfinence Nurture. They are headed that sexual porn before marriage is entirely incorrect and should be overlooked fair. It lights a system that has lady ga ga nude sex pregnancies. Or should the benefits far be overlooked. One of the buddies that was hung by the federal want was a appropriate of porn only education. It can also weekend all the cooks that they have around your changing body and mutilate surges.

4 Replies to “Pros and cons of abstinence only sex education”

  1. This AptParenting article is for informative purposes only, and should not be used as a replacement for expert medical advice. For smoking, drinking, drugs, and guns, the message is just say no.

  2. Weighing Pros and Cons 3. It's possible that some religious educators may not teach students about certain topics because it doesn't coincide with their beliefs.

  3. In some demographics, the delay is more than a year, which gives the teen more time to mature.

  4. Students may still be subject to embarrassment or excitable by subject matter. Nearly all such programs contain material and messages that would be alarming and offensive to the overwhelming majority of parents.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*